3. Results
Table step one depicts this new prevalence of each of risks of the research, according to level of seriousness discovered. On top of that, it shows new reviews within distributions off boys and girls with the additional threats. Total, the players whom shown nothing wrong varied ranging from % who had no problems having difficult Sites play with or over so you're able to 83.4% that has no problems having on line grooming. I remember that all of the moderate and serious problems varied anywhere between 4% to have sexting and you can 17% getting difficult Sites play with. 9% regarding reasonable/serious problems plus cyberbullying, they achieved thirteen.7%. The fresh frequencies based in the more levels of issues was basically always better for women compared to guys.
Dining table step 1
Frequency of each and every of your own threats just like the a function of the severity of one's situation into full shot and of intercourse.
In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch's t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).
Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.
In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Dining table 2 ).
Table 2
Variations while the a purpose of instructional stage (1st–second, 3rd–fourth grades out-of CSE and you will Blog post-supplementary Studies) about risks (n = 3212, apart from the truth regarding cyber relationship punishment that have letter = 1061).
eastmeeteast püf noktalarıNote: Yards = arithmetic indicate; SD = basic departure, F = Welch's-F, p = significance; ? dos = eta squared.
Desk step three suggests the fresh correlations within some threats. Them had confident and extreme correlations with each other, toward matchmaking anywhere between cyberbullying victimization and cyber dating victimization position out. Sites risks having a sexual part (on the web brushing and you may sexting) was extremely correlated. Generally speaking, the new correlations was indeed highest for boys in the most common of one's dangers, apart from the fresh matchmaking between cyber relationship victimization and brushing and you will anywhere between difficult Sites explore and cyberbullying victimization, on line grooming and sexting.
Dining table step 3
Note: The correlations for boys are shown below the diagonal and for girls above it. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001. M = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation.
Table 4 gift ideas the fresh new comorbidities among certain Websites threats relevant in order to private correspondence (cyberbullying victimization, cyber dating abuse victimization, sexting an internet-based grooming). Just the members just who accomplished every item concerning the risks related to help you victimization (letter = 1109) have been sensed (we.e., removing on the analysis people that had no lover). Of the leftover people, 60.7% displayed at least one of analysed threats (letter = 674). The risk with the large private frequency is actually cyberbullying victimization (%), accompanied by on the web grooming. The most typical a couple-exposure combinations was indeed cyberbullying victimization-on the web grooming and you can cyberbullying-sexting. We focus on the 3-exposure mix of cyberbullying-sexting-grooming victimization. Finally, 5.49% of your victimized kids displayed all of the risks conjointly.