Table 2 Functions of people in four cultural groups

The results are expressed as means and standard deviations, unless stated otherwise. Between-group differences in subject characteristics were tested using one-way ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons using Tukey's multiple comparison procedure if a significant F test was obtained. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to adjust body composition results for comparison across ethnic groups. Before carrying out the ANCOVA, similarity of regression slopes among the ethnic groups was verified by examining the significance of the interaction between the covariate(s) and the group variable. Relationships between body composition measurements and age were investigated by multiple regression analysis controlling for independent variables such as height and weight. Potential interaction terms and non-linear relationships were examined for selected variables. Pearson's correlation coefficients are presented for bivariate linear relationships with age and partial correlation coefficients where adjustment is made for weight and height. Data were analysed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results with P < 0·05>

Demographics and you may whole-human anatomy composition

Human body structure properties of sufferers are summarised by the sex and you will ethnicity in Table dos. European men was basically young, taller along with all the way down FM and you can part of BF than just the competitors about other three groups. Western european female had been younger than just Western Indian feminine, and you may were large together with down FM and you will portion of BF than just their equivalents in the almost every other about three groups. The fresh Western Indian men got leg weight and BMC but higher portion of BF compared to European, Maori and you may Pacific dudes. The brand new Western Indian women including met with the highest portion of BF and also the lowest BMC of one's four cultural organizations, if you are their body lbs are below Maori and Pacific women rather than significantly distinct from this new Eu female. Shortly after improvement getting age, peak and you will lbs, Far eastern Indians met with the highest FM, reasonable body weight-ten0 % free mass and you can low BMC of your five cultural teams, when you are Pacific encountered the lower FM and you will higher body weight-100 % free bulk, for both men and women, together with higher BMC for males (Dining table step 3).

Dating anywhere between Body mass index and you can part of surplus fat

Curvilinear relationships between the percentage of BF and BMI for each ethnic group were linearised by logarithmically transforming BMI (Fig. 1)parison of regression equations of the percentage of BF on the logarithm of BMI with age as a covariate and with sex and ethnicity as group variables indicated significant heterogeneity in the slopes of the male and female equations (P < 0·0001).>

Fig. 1 Relationship between the percentage of body fat (BF) and BMI of European (?), Maori (0), Pacific Island (^) and Asian Indian (?) (a) men and (b) women. The linear regressions are: percentage of BF = 117·7 log₁₀(BMI) ? 144·2 (standard error of estimate (SEE) = 5·2 %, r 2 0·61, n 124) for European men (-); percentage of BF = 101·3 log₁₀(BMI) ? 122·0 (SEE = 4·6 %, r 2 0·74, n 109) for Maori men (- - -); percentage of BF = 93·6 log₁₀(BMI) ? 113·6 (SEE = 4·1 %, r 2 0·68, n 104) for Pacific Island men (·····); percentage of BF = 78·6 log₁₀(BMI) ? 79·4 (SEE = 5·0 %, ist es gut, Damen von Philippinen zu datieren r 2 0·52, n 117) for Asian Indian men (-·-·); percentage of BF = 103·5 log₁₀(BMI) ? 109·7 (SEE = 4·8 %, r 2 0·72, n 186) for European women (-); percentage of BF = 74·8 log₁₀(BMI) ? 70·3 (SEE = 3·9 %, r 2 0·72, n 90) for Maori women (---); percentage of BF = 65·2 log₁₀(BMI) ? 57·8 (SEE = 4·1 %, r 2 0·65, n 97) for Pacific Island women (·····); percentage of BF = 71·0 log₁₀(BMI) ? 57·7 (SEE = 4·4 %, r 2 0·60, n 107) for Asian Indian women (-·-·).